Income Tax Regulations for Child Content Creators of TikTok Platform: Inefficacy of Indonesian Legal Frameworks

Authors

  • Dinda Agustin Wulandari Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta,, Indonesia
  • Abdul Kadir Jaelani Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta,, Indonesia
  • Ong Argo Victoria Faculty of Medicine, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei,, Taiwan, Province of China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53955/jsderi.v2i2.35

Keywords:

Income Tax, Child Content Creators, Non-Taxable Income

Abstract

The massive growth of social media opens the door for anyone gain a lucrative content broadcasting which in turn benefit the subject in economic capacity and later becomes a potential of taxation object. However, not all content creators are subjected to income tax, such as the minors. The imposition of income tax must consider the subjective requirements which is related to the age of the tax subject. This study aims to examine the efficacy of Indonesian legal norms as a basis for imposing taxes on child content creators who have income above the minimum tax threshold. This research employs a statute approach completed with comparative perspective. Data were collected by investigating tax regulations in Indonesia and then comparing them with tax regulations in other countries. This study finds that income tax for minors is actually mentioned in Indonesian legislation. However, these regulations do not explicitly stipulate that children bear the responsibility for their own income tax. The law stipulates that the payment of a child's income tax integrates with their parent’s tax payment. This circumstance is different from the advanced countries like the USA and Australia where regulations regarding children's income tax are specifically addressed. Consequently, in Indonesia, minor content creators who have high incomes cannot be unequivocally subjected to income tax. This is because minors cannot obtain a Taxpayer Identification Number (NPWP) in their own name. For children with an economic capacity exceeding the minimum income threshold, obtaining a Taxpayer Identification Number is not mandatory.

References

Andini, Pramitha Rifa, ‘Pengaruh Konten Pada Official Akun TikTok Ruangguru Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Followers’, Jurnal Teroka, 1.1 (2023), 15–24 https://doi.org/10.26623/janaloka.v1i1%20Juni.7022

Ardin, Galih, ‘Estimasi Dampak Fiskal Penggunaan NIK Sebagai NPWP: Sebuah Studi Empiris’, Jurnal Pajak Dan Keuangan Negara (PKN), 4.1S (2022), 333–42 https://doi.org/10.31092/jpkn.v4i1s.1908

Boccabella, Dale, and Kayleen Manwaring, ‘Deemed Dividend Rules: Tax Free Extraction of Profits and the Exploitation of Structural Foundations of the Income Tax Regime’, Australian Tax Review, 49.2 (2020), 87–109

Chen, Joyce J, ‘Identifying Non-Cooperative Behavior among Spouses: Child Outcomes in Migrant-Sending Households’, Journal of Development Economics, 100.1 (2013), 1–18 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.06.006

Dewi, Retno Sari, ‘Pajak Penghasilan Pada Subjek Penghasilan Di Bawah Umur Melalui Media Sosial’, Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 23.2 (2020), 186–98 https://doi.org/10.56087/aijih.v23i2.54

Eissa, Nada, and Hilary Williamson Hoynes, ‘Taxes and the Labor Market Participation of Married Couples: The Earned Income Tax Credit’, Journal of Public Economics, 88.9 (2004), 1931–58 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.09.005

Hajawiyah, Ain, Trisni Suryarini, and Tarsis Tarmudji, ‘Analysis of a Tax Amnesty’s Effectiveness in Indonesia’, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 44 (2021), 100415 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2021.100415

Hanegbi, Rami, ‘Income Splitting in Australia: Time for a Principled Approach?’, TheAdelaide Law Review, 44.2 (2023), 401–40

Johan, Arvie, ‘The Income Tax of Breadwinner Wives in Indonesia: Law and Economics Approach’, Yuridika, 39.2 (2024), 153 https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v39i2.49979

Johnson, Shane, Robert Breunig, Miguel Olivo-Villabrille, and Arezou Zaresani, ‘Individuals’ Responsiveness to Marginal Tax Rates: Evidence from Bunching in the Australian Personal Income Tax’, Labour Economics, 87 (2024), 102461 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2023.102461

Leigh, Andrew, and Pierre van der Eng, ‘Inequality in Indonesia: What Can We Learn from Top Incomes?’, Journal of Public Economics, 93.1 (2009), 209–12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.09.005

Moore, Mick, ‘Obstacles to Increasing Tax Revenues in Low Income Countries’, International Centre for Tax and Development Working Paper, 15 (2013) https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2436437

Rahayu, Novi Quintena, ‘Dilematika Hukum Kedudukan Anak Sebagai Outsourcing Menurut Hukum Ketenagakerjaan’, Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 14.1 (2019), 131–41 https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v14i1.1275

Rosid, Arifin, and Romadhaniah. “Assessing the Effectiveness of Law Enforcement on Improving Tax Compliance in Indonesia: An Empirical Investigation.†Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 59, no. 2 (2023): 243–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2021.1970110

Said, Emmiryzan W, ‘Tax Policy in Action: 2016 Tax Amnesty Experience of the Republic of Indonesia’, Laws, 2017 https://doi.org/10.3390/laws6040016

Setyowati, Milla Sepliana, Niken Desila Utami, Arfah Habib Saragih, and Adang Hendrawan. “Strategic Factors in Implementing Blockchain Technology in Indonesia’s Value-Added Tax System.†Technology in Society 72 (2023): 102169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102169

Sulastyawati, Dwi, ‘Hukum Pajak Dan Implementasinya Bagi Kesejahteraan Rakyat’, SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I, 1.1 (2014), 120 https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v1i1.1530

Suwardi, Suwardi, ‘Maintaining Progresiveness of Personal Income Tax Rates in The Indonesian Income Tax Law’, International Journal of Pertapsi, 1.1 (2023), 41–50 https://doi.org/10.9744/ijp.1.1.41-50

Tyutyuryukov, Vladimir, and Natalia Guseva. “From Remote Work to Digital Nomads: Tax Issues and Tax Opportunities of Digital Lifestyle.†IFAC-PapersOnLine 54, no. 13 (2021): 188–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.10.443

Waluyo, Waluyo, and Caturida Meiwanto Doktoralina. “Factor Affecting Tax Avoidance Through Thin Capitalisation: Multinational Enterprises in Indonesia.†Int. J. Manag. Bus. Res 8, no. 3 (2018): 210–16. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3436024

Wasesa, Tjandra, Heri Toni, Hendro Pranoto, Diana Zuhroh, Sutini Sutini, and Wiratna Wiratna, ‘Pentingnya Pemadanan NIK – NPWP Bagi Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Serta Tata Cara Validasinya’, 4.2 (2023), 102–16 https://doi.org/10.30640/akuntansi45.v4i2.1813

Wijaya, Suparna, and Annisa Febriana Safira, ‘Pajak Penghasilan Atas Anak Angkat Yang Berpenghasilan’, Owner: Riset Dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 5.2 (2021), 396–406 https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v5i2.476

Wilson-Rogers, Nicole, Annette Morgan, and Dale Pinto, ‘Death and Taxes: Taxation Issues and Consequences That Arise on the Final Frontier’, Taxation in Australia, 47.6 (2012), 362–70 https://doi.org/10.3316/ielapa.666317608208108

Downloads

Published

2024-05-31

Citation Check