Login

P-ISSN: 3090-9309

E-ISSN: 3109-0931

Contrarius

Publishing model:

A.

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

 

Authors should submit only manuscripts that have been carefully proofread. The manuscript is a scientific paper from research results or conceptual ideas. Written in English. It is original (no plagiarism) and has never been published elsewhere.

 

B.

WRITING RULES

 

1.

The manuscript is written in 7000-12000 words using the Constantia font, size 10, with 1.25 line spacing, on A4 paper. For more details, see the journal template!

 

2.

Systematics of scriptwriting research results include:

 

a.

Title

 

The title uses an effective sentence with a maximum of 15 words and includes the contract number and the source of research funding.

 

b.

Identity of Author

 

Author's Name

Affiliation

E-mail (The listed e-mail should be active because of the correspondence by e-mail.)

 

c.

Abstract

 

The abstract should be between 150 and 250 words. An abstract should at least consist of a short background of the research, research purposes, method of research, results and findings, and conclusion. The abstract should be standalone, meaning that there should be no citations in the abstract. Abstract typed on the justified margin, font Gramond FB, 13 PT and single-spaced.

 

d.

Introduction

 

The introduction should be clear and provide the legal issue to be discussed in the manuscript. Before the objective, the author should provide an adequate background and a very short literature survey in order to record existing solutions, to show which is the best of previous researchers, to show what you hope to achieve (to show the limitation), and to show the scientific merit or novelties of the manuscript. At the end, you should explain the urgency and clearly state the aims of your study and mention the problem of the research in this section.

 

e.

Problems

 

Write the issues that are studied from your writing here. The problem must be clear. At least one subject matter is reviewed.

 

f.

Research Methods

 

This method is written in descriptive form and should provide a statement on the research methodology, including the type of research, research approach, data sources, and analysis methods. The author should explain the mechanism for analysing the legal issue. This method aims to give the reader as much as possible an idea of the approach used; it is optional and intended only for an original research article.
(For Conceptual Ideas Without Research Method)

 

g.

Results and Discussion

 

Results should be clear and concise. Discussion should explore the significance of the results of the work, not repeat them. Avoid extensive citations and discussion of published literature. For more details, see the journal template!

 

h.

Conclusion

 

The main conclusions of the study may be presented in a short Conclusions section. The conclusion section should lead the reader to the manuscript's key points.

 

i.

Suggestion

 

The author should provide suggestions or recommendations related to the analysed object and stimulate further research.

 

j.

References

 

References are based on article citations. For more details, see the journal template!

 

C.

BODY NOTES AND REFERENCES

 

  1. Expect a minimum of 80 references, primarily with a minimum of 80% to journal papers published between 2018 and 2025.
  2. Use of a tool such as Zotero, Mendeley, or EndNote for reference management and formatting, and choose the Modern Humanities Research Association 3rd edition style

Example:

Equipping residential rooms with refrigerators, fans, televisions, and/or electronic devices is prohibited for inmates. In Article 5, letter B of Law No. 12 of 1995, which says "equality of treatment and service,"10, it is very clear that inmates have the same rights and obligations, with no distinction between them. This is carried out in accordance with equal treatment and service in the correctional development system, namely, the provision of equal treatment and service to correctional residents without discrimination. Article 28, paragraph (3), of Government Regulation No. 32/1999 on the Terms and Procedures for the Implementation of Correctional Residents states that inmates and correctional students are prohibited from bringing television, radio, or other electronic media into prison for personal gain. [1]

Violations committed by inmates have luxurious room facilities, also contrary to Article 4 of the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia No. 6 of 2013 on the Code of Conduct of Correctional Institutions and State Prisons in letter I, which says each inmate is prohibited from equipping residential rooms with refrigeration devices, fans, televisions, and/or other electronic devices, and in letter J possesses, carries, and/or uses electronic devices, such as laptops or computers, cameras, recording devices, mobile phones, and the like. [2]

The poor prison conditions in Indonesia are well below the UN minimum standard rules for the treatment of inmates, also known as the Nelson Mandela Rule. The Mandela rule requires the availability of basic needs and services in accordance with national standards. The standard stipulated by the Ministry of Health for calorie intake per person is between 2,475 and 2,725 kilocalories, but prisons in Indonesia are only able to provide 1,559 to 2,030 kilocalories due to a low budget. The grocery budget for inmates in Indonesia is USD $1.50 per inmate per day, or about Rp15,000 per inmate per day for health services; each inmate only gets a budget of USD $1.20 per year, or about Rp1,000 per month. An inmate needs to share a cell with 6-7 others in a cell designed for 3 people only. They eat, sleep, and defecate there. If the inmates are without any financial support, life will be very hard.[3]

 

[1] Mariam Abdulkareem and others, ‘Life Cycle Assessment of a Low-Height Noise Barrier for Railway Traffic Noise’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 323 (2021), 129169 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129169

[2] Amir N. Licht, Chanan Goldschmidt, and Shalom H. Schwartz, ‘Culture Rules: The Foundations of the Rule of Law and Other Norms of Governance’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 35.4 (2007), 659–88 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2007.09.001

[3] Anu Lähteenmäki-Uutela and others, ‘Legal Rights of Private Property Owners vs. Sustainability Transitions?’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 323.September (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129179

References

Amir N. Licht, Chanan Goldschmidt, and Shalom H. Schwartz, ‘Culture Rules: The Foundations of the Rule of Law and Other Norms of Governance’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 35.4 (2007), 659–88 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2007.09.001

Anu Lähteenmäki-Uutela and others, ‘Legal Rights of Private Property Owners vs. Sustainability Transitions?’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 323.September (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129179

Mariam Abdulkareem and others, ‘Life Cycle Assessment of a Low-Height Noise Barrier for Railway Traffic Noise’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 323 (2021), 129169 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129169