Rina Arum Prastyanti (1), Nguyen Thi Thu Hang (2), Imiefoh Andrew Ikhayere (3)
This study examines fiduciary security by emphasising the legal consequences arising from the seizure of fiduciary objects upon the rights of creditors and debtors, and by comparing fiduciary regulatory frameworks in Indonesia, Australia, and the United States. The research adopts a normative legal method utilising secondary data in the form of primary and secondary legal materials. The approaches employed include statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches to analyse the norms, principles, and practices governing fiduciary law across different jurisdictions. The research is descriptive and analytical, and it applies qualitative juridical analysis. The findings indicate that the seizure of fiduciary objects carries significant legal implications for both creditors and debtors, and that the implementation of Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Security has not fully safeguarded the interests of all parties. The international comparison reveals the necessity for clearer mechanisms for the enforcement of fiduciary security and the protection of creditors’ rights. Accordingly, a reconstruction of the normative framework within the Fiduciary Security Law is required to realise Rawlsian justice, through the strengthening of legal protection, the certainty of enforcement, and the equitable balance of rights between creditors and debtors.
A.A. Ngurah Duta Putra Adnyana, dan A.A. Gede Agung Dharmakusuma, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditur Dalam Hal Benda Jaminan Fidusia Dirampas Negara’, Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana, 2.6 (2018) https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthasemaya/article/view/39032
Abdul, Topan A., Hijrah lahaling, and Rusmulyadi, ‘Reconstruction of Pacta Sunt Servanda in Fiduciary Execution after Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/2019’, Judge : Jurnal Hukum , 6.05 (2025), 1682–95 <https://doi.org/10.54209/judge.v6i05.1935>
Aditya, Ryamizard Haritzidane Kasyfi, and Yunanto, ‘Eksekutorial Jaminan Fidusia Terhadap Debitur Yang Cidera Janji (Wanprestasi) Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019’, Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6.4 (2025) <https://doi.org/10.56370/JHLG.V6I4.891>
Afra, Fairuz, Fransiska NG Purba, Sabina Adilla, and Fathima Najma Zahira G, ‘Analisis Hukum Konsep Jaminan Dalam Penyelesaian Kasus Kredit Jaminan Fidusia’, Diponegoro Private Law Review, 9.1 (2022), 59–72 https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/dplr/article/view/18459
Ais, Chatamarrasjid, ‘“Fiduciary Duty” Sebagai Standar Para Direksi Dalam Melaksanakan Tugasnya’, Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 31.1 (2017), 63 <https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol31.no1.1315>
Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin, and Sayed Khalid Shahzad, ‘Rethinking How Laws Are Made: Indonesia’s Legal Method Dilemma’, Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues (JSDERI), 3.2 (2025), 170–90 <https://doi.org/10.53955/JSDERI.V3I2.32>
Alam, Syariful, Yaris Adhial Fajrin, Sholahuddin Al-Fatih, and Merve Ozkan Borsa, ‘Islamic Criminal Law Study on The Seizure of Corruptor Assets as an Indonesian’s Criminal Sanction in The Future’, JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah), 21.2 (2022), 143–56 <https://doi.org/10.31958/JURIS.V21I2.6722>
Anang, Taufik, and Yudha Kusuma, ‘Efektivitas Jaminan Perorangan Dan Fidusia Sebagai Instrumen Mitigasi Risiko Wanprestasi’, Journal Evidence Of Law , 4.3 (2025), 1331–34 <https://doi.org/10.59066/JEL.V4I3.1774>
Andini, Orin Gusta, Nilasari, and Andreas Avelino Eurian, ‘Restorative Justice in Indonesia Corruption Crime: A Utopia’, Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 31.1 (2023), 72–90 <https://doi.org/10.22219/LJIH.V31I1.24247>
Angelica Janwarin, Katarina Zein, Etty Mulyati, and Aam Suryamah, ‘Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Tanpa Melalui Putusan Pengadilan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 2/Puu-Xix/2021’, Syntax Literate ; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 8.2 (2023), 1002–15 <https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v8i2.11379>
Azani, Annisa Puspita, and ’ Suraji, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditur Dalam Eksekusi Objek Hak Tanggungan Dari Sita Eksekusi Pihak Ketiga (Studi Putusan No. 61/Pdt.Plw/2017/Pn. Jmb)’, Jurnal Privat Law, 12.1 (2024), 10 <https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v12i1.50092>
Badriyah, Siti Malikhatun, R. Suharto, and H. Kashadi, ‘Legal Protection for Creditor in the Online Registration of Fiducairy Guarantee in Consumen Finance’, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 175.1 (2018) <https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/175/1/012215>
Bahar, T. Muhammad Ali, Tan Kamello, Suhaidi Suhadi, Saidin Saidin, and Rio Hilmawan Bagas Trihasworo, ‘Contractual Obligations in Financing with Fiduciary Security in Indonesia in the Context of Justice’, Lex Scientia Law Review, 7.1 (2023), 215–48 <https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v7i1.69318>
Bangun, Michael Hagana, ‘Analisis Komparatif Tanggung Jawab Fidusia Direksi Dan Perlindungan Pemegang Saham Minoritas: Studi Kritis Terhadap Hukum Perseroan Di Indonesia Dan Singapura’, Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 4.1 (2026), 434–47 <https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17873913>
Christy, Lisya Jatasiri, and Ramzy Muhammad Basyarahil, ‘Perbandingan Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Antara Indonesia Dan Belanda Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019’, JURNAL MINUTA, 7.2 (2025), 123–32 <https://doi.org/10.24123/minuta.v7i2.7637>
Adam D.Lomo, Fernando, Richard C, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Debitor Terhadap Objek Jaminan Fidusia Yang Diambil Paksa Oleh Juru Taguh (Debt Collector)’, Syntax Literate : Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 7.11 (2022).< https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v7i11.12427>
Dianawati, Catur Budi, and Amin Purnawan, ‘Kajian Hukum Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Yang Dilelang Tanpa Proses Permohonan Lelang Eksekusi Ke Ketua Pengadilan Negeri’, Jurnal Akta, 4.2 (2017), 125 <https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v4i2.1755>
Disemadi, Hari Sutra, ‘Lenses of Legal Research: A Descriptive Essay on Legal Research Methodologies’, Journal of Judicial Review, 24.2 (2022), 289–304 <https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v24i2.7280>
Dita, Bunga, and Rahma Cesaria, ‘Memahami Fiduciary Duty Direksi Berdasarkan Hukum Indonesia: Studi Perbandingan Dengan Hukum Inggris’, Begawan Abioso, 16.1 (2025), 11–22 <https://doi.org/10.37893/abioso.v16i1.1167>
Fazrin Khoirunnisa, Saskia, ‘Pengaturan Hukum Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Apabila Debitur Melakukan Tindakan Pelanggaran Perjanjian’, Court Review: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum (E-Issn: 2776-1916), 3.05 (2023), 12–23 <https://doi.org/10.69957/cr.v3i05.1359>
Fitri, Tita Jiwanty, Djumikasih Djumikasih, and Herlindah Herlindah, ‘Reconceptualizing Fiduciary Guarantee Execution After Indonesia’s Constitutional Court Ruling’, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES, 9.2 (2025), 1–12 <https://doi.org/10.47006/ijlres.v9i2.25054>
Irwan Hafid, ‘Perampasan Aset Tanpa Pemidanaan Dalam Perspektif Economic Analysis Of Law’, Lex Renaissan, 1.6 (2021). <https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol6.iss3.art3>
Halim, Kerenina Sunny, and Endang Suprapti, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Terhadap Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 36/Pdt.G.S/2023/PN Pdg)’, Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 8.1 (2025), 682–99 <https://doi.org/10.38035/rrj.v8i1.1890>
Hambali, Reghina Miftahuljannah, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Dalam Parate Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia’, Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 6.1 (2025), 98–102 <https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v6i1.837>
Harto, Eko Budhi, Nahdiya Sabrina, and Hatarto Pakpahan, ‘Legal Analysis of the Status of Evidence Proceeds of Money Laundering Crimes Encumbered by Fiduciary Guarantee’, International Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities (IJRSS) ISSN:2582-6220, DOI: 10.47505/IJRSS, 7.1 (2026), 292–302 <https://doi.org/10.47505/IJRSS.2026.1.22>
Hasanah, Lutfiatul, ‘Upaya Pengembalian Aset Negara Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dan Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2006)’, JURNAL ANTI KORUPSI, 11.2 (2021), 41–55 <https://doi.org/10.19184/JAK.V3I2.28922>
Muhammad Fahri Hidayat, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Jaminan Fidusia Atas Dirampasnya Objek Jaminan Yang Digunakan Sebagai Alat Kejahatan’, Panitera :Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2.2 (2024). https://panitera.amiin.or.id/index.php/panitera/article/view/25
Hufron, and Sultoni Fikri, ‘The Urgency of Regulating Forfeiture of Assets Gained from Corruption in Indonesia’, Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 32.2 (2024), 292–310 <https://doi.org/10.22219/LJIH.V32I2.35243>
Hukum, Kajian, Pengalihan Benda, Jaminan Fidusia, Tanpa Persetujuan, Tertulis Dari, and Penerima Fidusia, ‘Kajian Hukum Tentang Pengalihan Benda Jaminan Fidusia Tanpa Persetujuan Tertulis Dari Penerima Fidusia’, Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6.4 (2025) <https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v6i4.1678>
I Wayan Kharismawan, I Wayan Novy Purwanto, ‘Kewajiban Pemberi Fidusia Dalam Hal Obyek Jaminan Fidusia Dirampas Untuk Negara’, Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 2019
Iksan, Muchamad, Natangsa Surbakti, Marisa Kurnianingsih, Arief Budiono, Sholahuddin Al-Fatih, and Tomás Mateo Ramon, ‘Fulfilling the Restitution Rights of Crime Victims: The Legal Practice in Indonesia’, Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 12.4 (2023), 152 <https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2023-0101>
Ilma, Hutmi Amivia, ‘Tantangan Mekanisme Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture Dalam Rancangan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset Di Indonesia’, Ma’mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah Dan Hukum, 5.4 (2024), 321–44 <https://doi.org/10.15642/MAL.V5I4.373>
Inayah, Asti, Adhitia Pradana, Handityo Basworo, and Noor Asyik, ‘Perbandingan Praktik Jaminan Gadai Di Indonesia Dan Australia: Perspektif Hukum Perdata’, Soedirman Law Review, 6.3 (2024), 178–93 <https://doi.org/10.20884/1.slr.2024.6.3.16078>
Jamil, M., ‘Fiduciary Security Arrangements and Issues in Indonesia’, Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 1.2 (2021) <https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v1i2.1>
Juliani, Rika Dwi, and Syofiaty Lubis, ‘Pengembalian Aset Hasil Korupsi Dan Penanggulangan Korupsi Melalui Penyitaan Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture: Tinjauan Hukum Indonesia Dan United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) 2003’, Jurnal Educatio : Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29210/1202322846>
Junaedi, Budi, Merry Tjoanda, and Teng Berlianty, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Pada Debitur Atas Penarikan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Melalui Parate Eksekusi’, PATTIMURA Legal Journal, 1.2 (2022), 124–32 <https://doi.org/10.47268/pela.v1i2.6433>
Kaltara, Politeknik Bisnis, ‘Tinjauan Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Tentang Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Dan Perlindungan Hak Debitur’, Sanskara Hukum Dan HAM, 4.02 (2025), 155–63 <https://doi.org/10.58812/shh.v4.i02>
Korua, Jolanda Marlien, Royke Adrianus Taroreh, Nurhikmah Nacrawy, and Vicky Fransiskus Taroreh, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditur: Tinjauan Komparatif Undang-Undang Tentang Fidusia Dan Hak Tanggungan’, Nuansa Akademik: Jurnal Pembangunan Masyarakat, 10.2 (2025), 625–38 <https://doi.org/10.47200/jnajpm.v10i2.3211>
Lating, Muhamad Irwan, Gatut Hendro Tri Widodo, and Roni Pandiyangan, ‘Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Debitur Leasing Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia’, Jurnal Sains, Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi Dan Hukum, 2.3 (2025), 128–36 <https://doi.org/10.60126/sainmikum.v2i3.964>
Latukau, Fikry, ‘Pengadopsian UNCAC Mengenai Pengembalian Aset Hasil Korupsi Yang Dibawa Atau Disimpan Ke Luar Negeri Dalam Penegakan Hukum Indonesia’, Jurnal Belo, 5.1 (2019), 10–31 <https://doi.org/10.30598/BELOVOL5ISSUE1PAGE10-31>
Lukito, Anastasia Suhartati, ‘Revealing the Unexplained Wealth in Indonesian CorporationA Revolutionary Pattern in Non-Conviction-Based Asset Forfeiture’, Journal of Financial Crime, 27.1 (2020), 29–42 <https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2018-0116>
Maulana, Irvan Maulana, and Mario Agusta Agusta, ‘Konsep Dan Implementasi Restorative Justice Di Indonesia’, Datin Law Jurnal, 2.2 (2021) <https://doi.org/10.36355/DLJ.V2I2.734>
Nataniel Rohi Bire, and Sri Mulyani, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Debitur Dalam Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 2/PUU-XIX/2021’, Jurnal Akta Notaris, 3.2 (2024), 210–20 <https://doi.org/10.56444/aktanotaris.v3i2.2179>
Nugraha, Andi Wahyu Agung, ‘Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Prespektif Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia’, Lex Privatum, VI.10 (2018), 116. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/25850
Pradnyawathi, Anak Agung Sri Nari Ratih, and Made Subawa, ‘Akibat Hukum Atas Musnahnya Objek Jaminan Fidusia Yang Tidak Diasuransikan Terhadap Kreditur.’, Journal of Syntax Literate, 10.4 (2025), 3703 <https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v10i4.58206>
Pratama, Rona Jingga Putri, and Endang Prasetyawati, ‘Pelindungan Hukum Bagi Penerima Fidusia Apabila Objek Jaminan Berupa Barang Persediaan Dialihkan Oleh Debitur Tanpa Persetujuan’, RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, 4.4 (2026), 10738–45 <https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i4.4177>
Purba, Daniel Christopel, ‘Tinjauan Yuridis Penguasaan Tanah Hak Milik Orang Lain Secara Melawan Hukum Dikaitkan Dengan Asas Perlindungan Hukum’, 2025 <https://repository.uhn.ac.id/handle/123456789/11982> [accessed 25 February 2026]
Purwanto, Purwanto, ‘Beberapa Permasalahan Perjanjian Pembiayaan Konsumen Dengan Jaminan Fidusia’, Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 1.2 (2012), 199 <https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v1i2.97>
Rachmat, Runarianu, and Suherman Suherman, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditor Pemegang Jaminan Fidusia Terhadap Harta Debitor Yang Dinyatakan Pailit’, ADIL: Jurnal Hukum, 11.1 (2020) <https://doi.org/10.33476/ajl.v11i1.1446>
Risky, Saiful, Sholahuddin Al-Fatih, Mabarroh Azizah, Islam Negeri, Profesor Kiai, Haji Saifuddin, and others, ‘Political Configuration of Electoral System Law in Indonesia from State Administration Perspective’, Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 6.1 (2023), 119–30 <https://doi.org/10.24090/VOLKSGEIST.V6I1.7940>
Rizky, Avila, Yuliana Setiadi, Felicitas Sri, Marniati Perlindungan, Hukum Bagi, Debitur Terhadap, and others, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Debitur Terhadap Penarikan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Oleh Kreditur Secara Sewenang-Wenang’, Al-Zayn : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 4.1 (2026), 5482–88 <https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v4i1>
Rusdiana, Erma, Nurus Zaman, Lindra Darnela, and Uswatun Hasanah, ‘Preventing the Politicisation of Corruption Crime Law Enforcement Based on Local Wisdom’, Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 33.1 (2025), 110–31 <https://doi.org/10.22219/LJIH.V33I1.37429>
Rustamovich, Bekov Ikhtiyor, Madiev Fakhriddin Khoshim Ugli, and Sholahuddin Al-Fatih, ‘Right to Privacy in the Development of Digital Technologies’, International Journal of Law and Society (IJLS), 4.1 (2025), 131–40 <https://doi.org/10.59683/IJLS.V4I1.171>
Ruth Anggilani Kaesmetan, Orpa Juliana Nubatonis, and Husni Kusuma Dinata, ‘Penarikan Paksa Kredit Kendaraan Yang Macet Oleh Pihak Leasing Yang Tidak Mempunyai Sertifikat Fidusia’, Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Administrasi Negara, 3.2 (2025), 84–97 <https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v3i2.1838>
Setiyono, Joko, Eduard Quiko, Andini Kusuma Putri, and Darminto Hartono, ‘Enhancing Cross-Border Justice: Facilitating Asset Recovery from Corruption Between Indonesia and Australia Through Mutual Legal Assistance’, Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 9.2 (2024), 537–70 <https://doi.org/10.15294/JILS.V9I2.877>
Siboy, Ahmad, Sholahuddin Al-Fatih, Devi Triasari, and Hilaire Tegnan, ‘Legal Social Justice in Appointment Non-Definitive Regional Heads toward Welfare State’, BESTUUR, 11.1 (2023), 144–70 <https://doi.org/10.20961/BESTUUR.V11I1.71055>
Simaela, Semuel Willem, Jenny Kristiana Matuankotta, and Sarah Selfina Kuahaty, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Kepemilikan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Yang Telah Dialihkan Tanpa Sepengetahuan Kreditur’, TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3.2 (2023), 140 <https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i2.1559>
Simamora, Janpatar, and Risma Elfrida Esther Manik, ‘Legal Politics in Combating Corruption During Indonesia’s Era of Regional Autonomy’, Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 10.1 (2025), 135–64 <https://doi.org/10.15294/JILS.V10I1.3885>
Simangunsong, Daniel P, Joko Setiono, and Albertus Wahyu Rudhanto, ‘Legal Protection for Creditors as Holders of Fiduciary Rights Against Unlawful Transfer of Motor Vehicles by Debtors in Financing Agreements’, Jurnal Greenation Sosial Dan Politik, 3.3 (2025), 465–73 <https://doi.org/10.38035/jgsp.v3i3.428>
Siregar, Aina Maryam, Indana Halwa Shabri, Khairiah Nasution, Nabila Putri Ayuni, and Sinar Hidayat Habeahan, ‘Analisis Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Pemberian Modal Usaha Oleh Kreditur Menurut Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999’, Jurnal Sahabat ISNU SU , 2.1 (2025), 23–32 <https://journal.isnu-sumut.org/index.php/jsisnu/article/view/732>
Siswani, Carina Budi, and Denis Bergkamps Wabia, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Pemegang Jaminan Fidusia Setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusinomor 18/Puu-Xvii/2019’, PATRIOT, 18.1 (2025) <https://jurnal.uncri.ac.id/index.php/patriot/article/view/6>
Sobko, Ganna, Natalia Chenshova, Maksym Viunyk, Tetiana Duiunova, and Evgenia Palii, ‘Characteristics of Punishment for Property Embezzlement and Appropriation by Military Personnel through Abuse of Office’, Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 31.1 (2023), 157–80 <https://doi.org/10.22219/LJIH.V31I1.25933>
Soegianto, Diah Sulistiyani, and Muhammad Junaidi, ‘Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Kajian Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia’, Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 4.2 (2019), 210 < https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v4i2.1658>
Sofwan, Sri Soedewi Masjchoen, Beberapa Masalah Pelaksanaan Jaminan Khususnya Fidusia Di Dalam Praktek Dan Perkembangannya Di Indonesia (Yogyakarta: Fakultas Hukum UGM, 1997)
Sunaryo, Sidik, and Sholahuddin Al-Fatih, ‘How Corruptor Should Be Punished? A Comparative Study Between Criminal Law, Islamic Law, and Customary Law’, International Journal Of Criminal Justice Sciences, 17.2 (2022), 91–100 <https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4756112>
Sunaryo, Sidik, Shinta Ayu Purnamawati, Muhammad Jihadi, and Sholahuddin Al-Fatih, ‘Narasi Ontologi Moralitas Hukum Korupsi Di Indonesia Berdasarkan Nilai Islam’, Jurnal Hukum Unissula, 2025 <https://doi.org/10.26532 / jh.v41i1.37154>
Suryani, Azarella, and Wirdhayanti Sriyono, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemanfaatan Hak Cipta Konten Digital Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Ekonomi Kreatif’, Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, 5.3 (2025), 535–42 <https://doi.org/10.56128/jkih.v5i3.718>
Tantimin, Tantimin, ‘Penyitaan Hasil Korupsi Melalui Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture Sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Negara’, Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 5.1 (2023), 85–102 <https://doi.org/10.14710/JPHI.V5I1.85-102>
Tegnan, Hilaire, Lego Karjoko, Jaco Barkhuizen, and Anis H. Bajrektarevic, ‘Mining Corruption and Environmental Degradation in Indonesia: Critical Legal Issues’, Bestuur, 9.2 (2021), 90–100 <https://doi.org/10.20961/BESTUUR.V9I2.55219>
Wahyu, Agung Nugraha Andi, ‘Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Prespektif Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia’, Lex Privatum, VI.10 (2018) < https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/25850>
Wangga, Maria Silvya E., Nadzriah Ahmad, Jufryanto Puluhulawa, and Vifi Swarianata, ‘Periscope of Ideas Selective Criteria for the Application of Restorative Justice in Corruption Crimes’, Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 9.1 (2024), 1–30 <https://doi.org/10.15294/JILS.VOL9I1.4530>
Wiraguna, Sidi Ahyar, ‘Metode Normatif Dan Empiris Dalam Penelitian Hukum: Studi Eksploratif Di Indonesia’, Public Sphere: Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan Dan Hukum, 3.3 (2024) <https://doi.org/10.59818/jps.v3i3.1390>
Yosafet, Yafet, and Wilben Rissy, ‘Ketentuan Dan Pelaksanaan Business Judgement Rule Di Amerika, Australia Dan Indonesia’, Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 49.2 (2020), 160–71 <https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.49.2.2020.160-171>
Zulfikar, Reza, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Jaminan Fidusia Atas Dirampasnya Objek Jaminan Dalam Perkara Korupsi’, JH Ius Quia Iustum, 29.1 (2022), 47–69 <https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss1.art3>