Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia
Login


Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues (JSDERI)

 Submit manuscript

Data Protection Conflicts and Procedural Fairness in Cross-Border Digital Dispute Resolution

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues:
DOI : https://doi.org/10.53955/jsderi.v4i1.162
Published : Mar 18, 2026

Naeem AllahRakha (1), Axmedshaeva Mavluda (2), Abdurasulova Kumrinisa (3), Musayev Elbek (4), Utegenov Nurbolat (5)

(1) Tashkent State University of Law, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
(2) Tashkent State University of Law, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
(3) Tashkent State University of Law, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
(4) Tashkent State University of Law, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
(5) Law Enforcement Academy, Kosshy, Kazakhstan
Fulltext View | Download

Abstract:

The rapid digitalization of society has given rise to digital dispute resolution (DDR) mechanisms that are transforming traditional justice systems through online, automated, and platform-based processes. However, the rapid expansion of these mechanisms has outpaced regulatory development, leaving unresolved questions about jurisdiction, enforceability, and user protection. This study examines how conflicts between incompatible data protection regimes and the absence of uniform procedural fairness standards in cross-border digital dispute resolution (DDR) interact to create compounded rights deficits for users. Using a qualitative document analysis design combined with doctrinal legal research, the study analyses the structural incompatibility between GDPR Articles 3, 5, and 46–48 and US-based cross-border DDR platforms, and assesses the procedural fairness deficits including opacity of automated decisions, absence of human review, and foreclosure of meaningful appeal that result from platform-based dispute resolution operating outside binding procedural standards. The central finding is that these two regulatory failures are structurally interdependent: the same conditions that enable data protection violations simultaneously deprive users of the informational preconditions of a fair hearing. The study proposes an integrated regulatory framework comprising unified recognition rules conditioned on dual compliance with data protection and procedural fairness standards, a mandatory accreditation scheme for cross-border DDR providers, and regulatory sandboxes for supervised innovation. The findings provide an analytically grounded framework for addressing a compound regulatory failure that currently affects millions of cross-border DDR users.

References

Abbott, Ryan and Brinson S Elliott, ‘Putting the Artificial Intelligence in Alternative Dispute Resolution’, Amicus Curiae, 4 (2023), 685–706 https://doi.org/10.14296/ac.v4i3.5627

Abrusci, Elena and Richard Mackenzie-Gray Scott, ‘The Questionable Necessity of a New Human Right against Being Subject to Automated Decision-Making’, International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 31 (2023), 114–43 https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaad013

Ahern, Deirdre, ‘Operationalising AI Regulatory Sandboxes under the EU AI Act: The Triple Challenge of Capacity, Coordination and Attractiveness to Providers’, Cambridge Forum on AI: Law and Governance, 1 (2025), e35 https://doi.org/10.1017/cfl.2025.10023

Ahi, Alan A, Noemi Sinkovics and Rudolf R Sinkovics, ‘E-Commerce Policy and the Global Economy: A Path to More Inclusive Development?’, Management International Review, 63 (2023), 27–56 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-022-00490-1

Ajakaye, Funmibi, ‘A Governance Framework for Cross-Border Data Protection Compliance under the GDPR and CCPA’, International Journal of Social Science Exceptional Research, 2 (2023), 193–210 https://doi.org/10.54660/IJSSER.2023.2.5.193-210

Alamdari, Bahar Hatami, ‘The Question of Remote Hearings in International Commercial Arbitration’, in The Impact of Covid on International Disputes (Brill | Nijhoff, 2022), pp. 141–56 https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004514836_009

Alessa, Hibah, ‘The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Online Dispute Resolution: A Brief and Critical Overview’, Information & Communications Technology Law, 31 (2022), 319–42 https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2022.2088060

Alhiniti, Yasar and Muhannad Yassin Abu Zaid, ‘Future Prospects of Electronic Commercial Arbitration in Light of Modern Technologies and Artificial Intelligence’, in In: Sarea, A., Echchabi, A., Salami, M.A., Mahmood, A. (Eds) Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Innovation Management and Risk Management. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control (Springer, Cham., 2026), pp. 1987–97 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-95310-1_144

AllahRakha, Naeem, ‘Legislators Qualifications in Pakistan Under Islamic Constitutional Provisions’, Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 5 (2025), 473–99 https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v5i2.491

———, ‘The Legality of Reverse Engineering and The Protection of Trade Secrets in The Software Industry’, Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syariah, 15 (2025), 309–36 https://doi.org/10.18860/j.v15i2.28422

Azizah, Azizah, Fawaidil Ilmiah, Khrisna Hadiwinata and Mahamadaree Waeno, ‘Digitalization Of Alternative Dispute Resolution: Realizing Business Fair Principles In The Current Era’, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 23 (2023), 429 https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2023.23.2.3667

Balendra, Soorya, ‘Meta’s AI Moderation and Free Speech: Ongoing Challenges in the Global South’, Cambridge Forum on AI: Law and Governance, 1 (2025), e21 https://doi.org/10.1017/cfl.2025.5

Ballerini, Jacopo, Dennis Herhausen and Alberto Ferraris, ‘How Commitment and Platform Adoption Drive the E-Commerce Performance of SMEs: A Mixed-Method Inquiry into e-Commerce Affordances’, International Journal of Information Management, 72 (2023), 102649 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102649

Bhushan, Tripti, ‘The Impact of Digital Technologies on Alternative Dispute Resolution’, Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution, 5 (2023) https://doi.org/10.52028/rbadr.v5i10.ART16.Ind

Carlson, Wendy, ‘Increasing Access to Justice through Online Dispute Resolution’, International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution, 7 (2020), 17–31 https://doi.org/10.5553/IJODR/235250022020006001003

CAUFFMAN, Caroline and Catalina GOANTA, ‘A New Order: The Digital Services Act and Consumer Protection’, European Journal of Risk Regulation, 12 (2021), 758–74 https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2021.8

Chen, Gabriel Kwok Hui and Araz Taeihagh, ‘Designing Regulatory Sandboxes: A Comprehensive Framework for Aligning Functionalities and Objectives’, Policy Design and Practice, 9 (2026), 1–15 https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2025.2570954

Costello, Róisín Áine, ‘Schrems II: Everything Is Illuminated?; Schrems II: Everything Is Illuminated?’, European Papers Www.Europeanpapers.Eu ISSN, 5 (2020), 1045–59 https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/396

van Daalen, OL, ‘The Right to Encryption: Privacy as Preventing Unlawful Access’, Computer Law & Security Review, 49 (2023), 105804 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105804

Dg. Takenang, Jusman, Ma’ruf Akib, Sudirman Sudirman, Wahyudi Umar and Fe Fikran Alfurqon, ‘E-Commerce Dispute Resolution Through Online Dispute Resolution’, SASI, 31 (2025), 117 https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v31i2.2865

Dimitropoulos, Georgios, ‘International Commercial Courts in the “Modern Law of Nature”: Adjudicatory Unilateralism in Special Economic Zones’, Journal of International Economic Law, 24 (2021), 361–79 https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgab017

Ebner, Noam and Elayne E Greenberg, ‘Strengthening Online Dispute Resolution Justice’, Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 63 (2020) https://doi.org/<https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy/vol63/iss1/9

Esteban de la Rosa, Fernando, ‘Towards a People-Centric Digitalization of Justice Systems’, in Digitalization and Artificial Intelligence in Courts (Oxford University PressOxford, 2025), pp. 3–29 https://doi.org/10.1093/9780198918752.003.0002

Ferrara, Emilio, ‘Fairness and Bias in Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Survey of Sources, Impacts, and Mitigation Strategies’, Sci, 6 (2023), 3 https://doi.org/10.3390/sci6010003

Ferreira, Daniel Brantes, Cristiane Giovannini, Elizaveta Gromova and Gustavo da Rocha Schmidt, ‘Arbitration Chambers and Trust in Technology Provider: Impacts of Trust in Technology Intermediated Dispute Resolution Proceedings’, Technology in Society, 68 (2022), 101872 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101872

Fischman-Afori, Orit, ‘Due Process by Design: Enhancing Fairness and Trust in AI Decision-Making’, Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12 (2025), 102178 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102178

Forti, Mirko, ‘Addressing Algorithmic Errors in Data-Driven Border Control Procedures’, German Law Journal, 25 (2024), 635–45 https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2023.102

Frosio, Giancarlo and Christophe Geiger, ‘Taking Fundamental Rights Seriously in the Digital Services Act’s Platform Liability Regime’, European Law Journal, 29 (2023), 31–77 https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12475

Gabuthy, Yannick, ‘Blockchain-Based Dispute Resolution: Insights and Challenges’, Games, 14 (2023), 34 https://doi.org/10.3390/g14030034

Gao, Yuanfei and Yuan Liu, ‘Construction and Application of International Commercial Dispute Resolution Mechanism Model’, ed. by Muhammad Arif, Security and Communication Networks, 2022 (2022), 1–12 https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2978056

Gascón Marcén, Ana, ‘The Push for the International Regulation of Cross-Border Access to Electronic Evidence and Human Rights’, CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL, 15 (2023), 385–402 https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2023.7545

Giupponi, Belen Olmos, ‘“Virtual” Dispute Resolution in International Arbitration’, in The Impact of Covid on International Disputes (Brill | Nijhoff, 2022), pp. 62–83 https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004514836_005

Gómez-Moreno, Juan Pablo, ‘Advocacy for Online Proceedings: Features of the Digital World and Their Role in How Communication Is Shaped in Remote International Arbitration’, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 37 (2024), 865–85 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10041-y

Green, Daniel, ‘Strategic Indeterminacy and Online Privacy Policies: (Un)Informed Consent and the General Data Protection Regulation’, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 38 (2025), 701–29 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-024-10132-4

Grimmelikhuijsen, Stephan, ‘Explaining Why the Computer Says No: Algorithmic Transparency Affects the Perceived Trustworthiness of Automated Decision‐Making’, Public Administration Review, 83 (2023), 241–62 https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13483

Hučková, Regina, ‘Automated Decision-Making and the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Resolving Disputes Over Illegal Content on Digital Platforms’, Strong and Secure Europe: Legal and Economic Aspects, 9 (2025), 479–90 https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/38127

Internatioanl Monetary Fund, ‘Digital Money Across Borders’, Policy Papers, 20 (2020) https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513559209.007

Juliussen, Bjørn Aslak, Elisavet Kozyri, Dag Johansen and Jon Petter Rui, ‘The Third Country Problem under the GDPR: Enhancing Protection of Data Transfers with Technology’, International Data Privacy Law, 13 (2023), 225–43 https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipad013

Kadioglu Kumtepe, Cemre C, ‘Unpacking the Technology of Trust: Establishing Trust and Fairness in Online Dispute Resolution through Blockchain and Smart Contracts’, International Journal of Law And Information Technology, 33 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaaf017

Kouroutzas, Christos and Venetia Palamari, ‘Opening the Black Boxes of the Black Carpet in the Era of Risk Society: A Sociological Analysis of AI, Algorithms and Big Data at Work through the Case Study of the Greek Postal Services’, AI & SOCIETY, 40 (2025), 825–38 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01916-0

Łągiewska, Magdalena, ‘New Technologies in International Arbitration: A Game-Changer in Dispute Resolution?’, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 37 (2024), 851–64 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10070-7

———, ‘The New Landscape of Arbitration in View of Digitalization’, in The Impact of Covid on International Disputes (Brill | Nijhoff, 2022), pp. 208–17 https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004514836_013

Leerssen, Paddy, ‘An End to Shadow Banning? Transparency Rights in the Digital Services Act between Content Moderation and Curation’, Computer Law & Security Review, 48 (2023), 105790 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105790

Lubasz, Dominik, Agnieszka Jabłonowska and Monika Namysłowska, ‘Protected by Design’, in The Cambridge Handbook of AI and Consumer Law (Cambridge University Press, 2024), pp. 147–60 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009483599.016

Makarenkov, Oleksii and Lurdes Varregoso Mesquita, ‘Challenges of Legal Guarantees for the Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in International Commercial Cases’, Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 7 (2023), 107–26 https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-7.1-a000133

Marelli, Massimo, ‘The Law and Practice of International Organizations’ Interactions with Personal Data Protection Domestic Regulation: At the Crossroads between the International and Domestic Legal Orders’, Computer Law & Security Review, 50 (2023), 105849 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105849

Metselaar, Samantha Alexandra, Laura den Dulk and Brenda Vermeeren, ‘Teleworking at Different Locations Outside the Office: Consequences for Perceived Performance and the Mediating Role of Autonomy and Work-Life Balance Satisfaction’, Review of Public Personnel Administration, 43 (2023), 456–78 https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X221087421

Millard, J.., Impact of Digital Transformation on Public Governance : New Forms of Policy-Making and the Provision of Innovative, People-Centric and Inclusive Public Services, 2023 https://doi.org/10.2760/355723

Moreno-Sánchez, Pedro A, Javier Del Ser, Mark van Gils and Jussi Hernesniemi, ‘A Design Framework for Operationalizing Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Requirements, Tradeoffs and Challenges for Its Clinical Adoption’, Information Fusion, 127 (2026), 103812 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103812

Multi-Tier Approaches to the Resolution of International Disputes, ed. by Anselmo Reyes and Weixia Gu (Cambridge University Press, 2021) https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108854306

Oltra Gras, Ignacio, ‘Online Courts: Bridging the Gap Between Access and Justice’, Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 10 (2021) https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.2052-1871.1214

Oluwatosin Reis, Nkechi Emmanuella Eneh, Benedicta Ehimuan, Anthony Anyanwu, Temidayo Olorunsogo and Temitayo Oluwaseun Abrahams, ‘PRIVACY LAW CHALLENGES IN THE DIGITAL AGE: A GLOBAL REVIEW OF LEGISLATION AND ENFORCEMENT’, International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6 (2024), 73–88 https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i1.733

Onțanu, Elena Alina and Eric Tjong Tjin Tai, ‘Digital Technology and Procedural Justice: Towards a Geography of Justice’, Tilburg Law Review, 30 (2025), 96–119 https://doi.org/10.5334/tilr.422

Ortolani, Pietro, ‘Digital Dispute Resolution’, in The Cambridge Handbook of Lawyering in the Digital Age (Cambridge University Press, 2021), pp. 140–56 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108936040.011

Pálfi, Dóra, ‘Internal Dispute Resolution Systems: Do High Promises Come with Higher Expectations?’, Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 64 (2024), 391–412 https://doi.org/10.1556/2052.2023.00469

Patel, Amaresh, Radha Ranjan, Rahul Kumar Kumar, Namisha Ojha and Aarti Patel, ‘Online Dispute Resolution Mechanism as an Effective Tool for Resolving Cross-Border Consumer Disputes in the Era of E-Commerce’, International Journal of Law and Management, 2025 https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-07-2024-0245

du Preez, Valerie, Shaun Bennet, Matthew Byrne, Aurelién Couloumy, Arijit Das, Jean Dessain, and others, ‘From Bias to Black Boxes: Understanding and Managing the Risks of AI – an Actuarial Perspective’, British Actuarial Journal, 29 (2024), e6 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357321724000060

Quach, Sara, Park Thaichon, Kelly D Martin, Scott Weaven and Robert W Palmatier, ‘Digital Technologies: Tensions in Privacy and Data’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 50 (2022), 1299–1323 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-022-00845-y

Quintais, João Pedro, Giovanni De Gregorio and João C Magalhães, ‘How Platforms Govern Users’ Copyright-Protected Content: Exploring the Power of Private Ordering and Its Implications’, Computer Law & Security Review, 48 (2023), 105792 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105792

Rayón Ballesteros, María Concepción and José Luis González Ávila, ‘Online Dispute Resolution Platforms (ODR): A Legal and Technical Perspective’, Law and Business, 4 (2024), 28–38 https://doi.org/10.2478/law-2024-0006

‘Remedies before the CJEU’, in Redressing Fundamental Rights Violations by the EU (Cambridge University Press, 2024), pp. 11–120 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009373814.004

Rodriguez Castellon, Jose Miguel, ‘Evolution and Challenges of DDR: A Policy Review Through the Prism of Colombia’s Three-Generational Experience’, 2024 https://doi.org/10.32388/H0E3RN

Ryngaert, Cedric and Mistale Taylor, ‘The GDPR as Global Data Protection Regulation?’, AJIL Unbound, 114 (2020), 5–9 https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2019.80

Salehi, Sajedeh and Marco Giacalone, ‘Small Claims and the Pursuit of (Digital) Justice: A Tiered Online Dispute Resolution Perspective’, Revista Ítalo-Española de Derecho Procesal, 2022, 181–213 https://doi.org/10.37417/rivitsproc/859

Sancho, Diana, ‘Automated Decision-Making under Article 22 GDPR’, in Algorithms and Law (Cambridge University Press, 2020), pp. 136–56 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108347846.005

Sanderson, Ben, Maria Scott and Sean Croft, ‘Hearings in International Arbitration’, in The Impact of Covid on International Disputes (Brill | Nijhoff, 2022), pp. 122–40 https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004514836_008

Schmitz, Amy J, ‘Evolution and Emerging Issues in Consumer Online Dispute Resolution (ODR)’, in The Cambridge Handbook of Emerging Issues at the Intersection of Commercial Law and Technology (Cambridge University Press, 2025), pp. 436–56 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009279079.023

———, ‘Resolving NFT and Smart Contract Disputes’, in The Cambridge Handbook of Law and Policy for NFTs (Cambridge University Press, 2024), pp. 372–94 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009279215.026

Shemshi, Vjollca and Boro Jakimovski, ‘Extended Model for Efficient Federated Identity Management with Dynamic Levels of Assurance Across EIDAS, REFEDS, and Kantara Frameworks for Educational Institutions’, Information, 16 (2025), 385 https://doi.org/10.3390/info16050385

Sirena, Pietro and Francesco Paolo Patti, ‘Smart Contracts and Automation of Private Relationships’, in Constitutional Challenges in the Algorithmic Society (Cambridge University Press, 2021), pp. 315–30 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914857.017

Soleimani, Marzieh, ‘Buyers’ Trust and Mistrust in e-Commerce Platforms: A Synthesizing Literature Review’, Information Systems and E-Business Management, 20 (2022), 57–78 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-021-00545-0

Spaulding, Norman W, ‘Online Dispute Resolution and the End of Adversarial Justice?’, in Legal Tech and the Future of Civil Justice (Cambridge University Press, 2023), pp. 251–85 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009255301.015

Sulistianingsih, Dewi, Alviona Anggita Rante Lembang, Yuli Prasetyo Adhi and Muchammad Shidqon Prabowo, ‘Online Dispute Resolution: Does the System Actually Enhance the Mediation Framework?’, Cogent Social Sciences, 9 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2206348

Tang, Zheng Sophia, Smart Court (Cambridge University Press, 2025) https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009319232

Tomasev, Nenad, Jonathan Leader Maynard and Iason Gabriel, ‘Manifestations of Xenophobia in AI Systems’, AI & SOCIETY, 40 (2025), 741–63 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01893-4

Towards Effective Governance of Justice Data, OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, October 2024, LXXIV https://doi.org/10.1787/d2950e02-en

Troisi, Emiliano, ‘Automated Decision Making and Right to Explanation. The Right of Access as Ex Post Information.’, European Journal of Privacy Law & Technologies, 2022, 181 https://doi.org/10.57230/ejplt221ET

Vladimirovich, Minbaleev and Evsikov Sergeevich, ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution in Digital Government’, REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION, 4 (2022), 119–46 https://doi.org/10.52028/rbadr.v4i7.8

de Vocht, DLF, ‘Trials by Video Link after the Pandemic: The Pros and Cons of the Expansion of Virtual Justice’, China-EU Law Journal, 8 (2022), 33–44 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12689-022-00095-9

Wachter, Sandra, Brent Mittelstadt and Chris Russell, ‘Why Fairness Cannot Be Automated: Bridging the Gap Between EU Non-Discrimination Law and AI’, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2020 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3547922

Wang, Lei, Ru-Shui Zhang and Cheng-Xin Zhang, ‘Live Streaming E-Commerce Platform Characteristics: Influencing Consumer Value Co-Creation and Co-Destruction Behavior’, Acta Psychologica, 243 (2024), 104163 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104163

Williamson, Michael J, David J Curnick, David MP Jacoby, Sarah M Durant and Helen MK O’Neill, ‘Ethical Considerations in Natural History Film Production and the Need for Industry-Wide Best Practice’, Global Ecology and Conservation, 34 (2022), e01981 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01981

Wisuda, Selvia, ‘Legal Study of the Validity of Electronic Signatures (Digital Signatures) in Business Contracts’, Activa Yuris: Jurnal Hukum, 3 (2023) https://doi.org/10.25273/ay.v3i2.18041

Yang, Xin, Ziqing Zhang and Yi Zhou, ‘The Application of Blockchain Technology in International Commercial Arbitration’, in Proceedings of the 2025 2nd International Conference on Digital Economy, Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence (New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2025), pp. 235–43 https://doi.org/10.1145/3762249.3762286

Yu, Liangru and Yi Li, ‘Artificial Intelligence Decision-Making Transparency and Employees’ Trust: The Parallel Multiple Mediating Effect of Effectiveness and Discomfort’, Behavioral Sciences, 12 (2022), 127 https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12050127

Yulia Anggraeni, Happy, Erna Listiawati, Anisya Auriana Dewi, R Tiara Ragylia and Febriyanti Wahyu Utami, ‘Decomposition of Legal Constructions in Cross-Border E-Commerce Dispute Resolution from an International Civil Law Perspective’, Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 10 (2025), 515–28 https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v10i3.12792

Yusuf, Amina and Robert Martinez, ‘Smart Contracts and Legal Enforceability: Decoding the Political Philosophy of Code as Law’, Interdisciplinary Studies in Society, Law, and Politics, 4 (2025), 292–302 https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.isslp.4.2.25

Zamoff, Mitch, ‘Safeguarding Confidential Arbitration Awards in Uncontested Confirmation Actions’, American Business Law Journal, 59 (2022), 505–57 https://doi.org/10.1111/ablj.12211

Zhao, Yun and Hui Chen, ‘Enhancing Access to Digital Justice: Digital Governance of Dispute Resolution and Dispute Prevention in Online Commercial Activities’, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 15 (2024), 273–304 https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idae001

Zhuk, Alesia, ‘Applying Blockchain to the Modern Legal System: Kleros as a Decentralised Dispute Resolution System’, International Cybersecurity Law Review, 4 (2023), 351–64 https://doi.org/10.1365/s43439-023-00086-x

Zygmuntowski, Jan Oleszczuk, ‘Data Governance in a Trilemma: A Qualitative Analysis of Rights, Values, and Goals in Building Data Commons’, Digital Society, 2 (2023), 30 https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-023-00058-y